Admins can read minds?
Admins can read minds?
Your opinion is wrong.
How is something a crime if you do it once, but not if you do it a million times?
Companies get to steal from people all the time without repercussions through erroneous fees, ‘mistakes’ in billing, denying coverage, and even outright fraud only gets a slap on the wrist fine at best. But an average person steals $5 and they are thrown in jail.
Literal is the only way these things are supposed to be read.
They could easily fix it by saying “groups (except for those that promote discrimination and/or hate such as nazis and racists)”
As it is worded you can’t discriminate against nazis and racists either.
Another thing to keep in mind is that pretty much all the C levels spend the majority of their time doing in person stuff with other high level narcissists where they have to focus on body language to avoid being the victim of interface politics and they don’t understand that most other people have positions that require long periods of focus on individual tasks.
Any time they say that people want to be in the office or that interpersonal communication only works in person they are projecting. They just have the ability to force it on everyone else.
Yet somehow it never is!
It is also an extremely practice in companies to underpay staff, especially women and minorities. This has been known for decades.
not allowing Department of Transportation officials to view the model’s source code
That is the problem. Using proprietary software that can’t even be reviewed outside of blackbox testing in the government’s contract process lets terrible software companies who won lowest bidder contracts is a recipe for disaster.
All government contracts should include the ability to review the code if they don’t just require it to be open source. The company can do a lot of business supporting their software without needing to keep it secret, and if secrecy from the government is vital to their business plan then they should stay out of the public sector.
“Lack of regulations” means ignoring existing regulations by insisting the new gig jobs aren’t technically the same thing because “reasons.”
Uber and Lyft were always taxis in everything except name.
Who wants to bet the option to disable doesn’t actually disable?
Did you read the other three replies saying the same thing and think ‘oh boy, I can get in on this action’?
“Don’t spend two seconds wording something clearly when publicly posting because everyone else can just figure out what you meant by inferring all of the context instead.”
How did you get ‘every post ever’ from ‘instance specific topic’?
I don’t browse other instances’ main, they show up under All together from any federated instance on kbin.
It takes two seconds to mention the instance when talking about an instance specific topic.
Stop trying to discourage suggestions to improve clarity.
A project manager should never be a stakeholder. A project manager should be managing expectations and pushing back against scope creep and ridiculous demands for immediate results as part of managing the project based on available resources and the estimates of the project team compared to overall progress. They will also address situations where different interacting parts need to be timed correctly, but that would also be the same responsibility of a scrum master, because they manage the project when using agile terms.
Most places treat project managers as neutered middle men who are implementing the will of the stakeholders, which is why so many end up being the terrible type that you are stereotyping project managers to be. Those same organizations will do the same thing to the scrum master or whatever name they give to the person who is supposed to be managing the project. You know, a project manager.
People can infer anything. That doesn’t mean they are right.