I’m not buying your slippery slope fallacy, but again, I’m glad you came around
I’m not buying your slippery slope fallacy, but again, I’m glad you came around
Oh ok, I didn’t realize we had strayed off topic. So it sounds like we’re in agreement these semiconductor sanctions against China are not “siege warfare”
“Starvation isn’t uncommon”
Since the whole point is starvation, you should probably expound on how a ban on semiconductor technology exports to China will induce starvation
These sanctions would be to ensure the US maintains a technological advantage through prohibiting the export of cutting edge technology. I’m wondering if you actually read what you quoted above before continuing to say this.
If you’re interested in actual modern examples of siege warfare, please read on
No they’re not. Economic sanctions meet no definition of siege warfare
Sure, this isn’t counter to that
Thanks for posting! The authors conclude the US can still put a stop to this with coordinated effort. They recommend the US implement these steps to stop China from further developing domestic semiconductor technology, and I fully support that!
Here are some steps that could be taken to ensure that China does not develop the ability to mass-manufacture the sorts of chips needed for high-end military applications in the coming years:
Limit ArFi immersion lithography tools.
Limit servicing of existing equipment.
Limit ArFi photoresist.
Limit masks.
Limit mask blanks, writers, and other associated infrastructure.
Limit metrology equipment.
Limit CMP equipment.
Limit epitaxy equipment.
Limit dry etch equipment.
Limit CVD and ALD equipment.
Limit advanced packaging equipment.
Limit ion implantation equipment.
Limit semiconductor manufacturing equipment subsystems and subassemblies.
Limit etchant gas.
Limit deposition precursors.
Limit chips that have >25.6Tbps of IO even if they have no compute.
Limit chips that have >1000TOPS of performance.
Limit the licensing of 200G SerDes.
Limit EDA tools.
Limit Joint Ventures and inbound investments.
Sounds like you need to get better at recruiting!
Fossil fuel consumption for electricity generation in the US has been decreasing along with the increase in renewable generation capacity, so what you’re saying is false
Here’s a source