If you like international and eclectic news, come and join me at @worldwithoutus (Link for Lemmy = worldwithoutus).

I’ve also started helping out at @worldnews, (Link for Lemmy = worldnews), @movies, (Lemmy = movies), and am a ghost at @13thfloor (Lemmy = 13th Floor).

  • 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle
  • Your topic’s a false premise. First of all it’s totally valid to criticize someone for something that couldn’t apply in the current situation, because what’s being criticized is the decisions and attitudes that their actions reveal.

    Meta’s refusal to moderate a website they control after multiple warnings that it was being used to incite genocide speaks to their institutional values, accountability, and culture.

    By contrast, plenty of instance owners have shown responsibility, accountability, and good faith about admins moderating the instances they control.

    try to be accurate and concise.

    Lol that’s condescending, and it’s also a bit offputting. I come here to bloviate thank you very much. :)

    The thing is though, I’m not part of the wider conversation about facebook above. You glommed onto a very simple, very specific point I made to someone else about the human impact of social media incitements to genocide.

    What Meta did to the ICC isn’t even related to my above link (which is about the Tigray genocide, not the Myanmar genocide). But it’s well-documented, and I’m not interested in rehashing it here.















  • Of course they are not factual.

    seems unlikely to me that the equivalent descendants of those people would live without civilization.

    Some of the people who were trafficked were a lot more literate and well-educated than their captors or eventual “owners”.

    I really wish the history of the African kingdoms was taught in schools. Or even basic modern politics and society since the person you’re replying to seems to think modern people living in Lagos or wherever are “running from lions” somehow.

    Poverty, perhaps

    We’re dealing with counterfactuals here but:

    …in a world where the African kingdoms were able to freely exchange culture and inventions with the West instead of being attacked and exploited by them for hundreds of years, we have no reason at all to think those in the world’s second largest continent, such a resource-rich place, would be living in poverty at all.


  • When I was a kid, there was this joke that involved getting a calculator to say “boobs” and then with a bit more input, “boobless”.

    Journalism is currently going through a more sophisticated version of this with AI.

    LLMs will say whatever. They don’t think and they don’t care. They contradict themselves all the time. Not so long ago Chat GPT was saying it would kill the entire world population and save Musk for the good of humanity.

    Various CEOs of large companies, on the other hand, have been implicated in genocides and slavery for centuries now. That’s very real.



  • Yeah the article ends up pretty much making this point too:

    We’re at the dawn of a platform shift. As Google tunes its algorithms and incorporates more AI content into its search results, the business model of the entire internet is undergoing an unpredictable change. Over the long term, Reddit’s scrambling efforts at financial security may prove just as futile as the moderators’ attempts to fight back.

    I’m really glad to be out from under all that corporate social media bs.