C to A adapters are sick and illegal

I still have some

Under the shower for me

I’ve really been enjoying Helix, which took a lot of inspiration (including key binds, mostly) from Kakoune. It’s just missing a plugin system to be perfect, but built in LSP support is soo nice

That wasn’t the attempt with the Guinness world record judge present, so they didn’t accept it

helix!

I read your first comment and thought “I wonder if they’re studying physics too, this sounds way too relatable”. lo and behold

hang in there!

Result<_>

What you’re forgetting is that Watt isn’t a unit of energy, it’s a unit of power, that is energy per time. So you wouldn’t say something generates 1W per hour, you’d just say something generates 1W. And if you multiply that by a unit of time, you get total energy. So an engine producing 2MW running for 5h would produce 10MWh, or 36GJ.

Most languages that let you do ambiguous return types don’t do compile-time type checking, and vice versa. But if it’s actually implemented that way, then it’s logically equivalent, you’re right. Still, I prefer having things explicit

Not quite, because the Maybe enum is neither int nor null, but it’s own, third thing. So before you can do any operations with the return value, you need to handle both cases that could occur

you could take a look at what Rust is doing with the Option enum. Superficially it looks similar to using null, but it actually accomplishes something very different.

A function that classically would return a value, say an int, but sometimes returns null instead, becomes a function that returns an Option. This forces explicit handling of the two cases, namely Some(value) or None. This way, it is next to impossible to try to do an operation on a value that does not exist.

For old languages, null coalescing is a great thing for readability. But in general null is a bad concept, and I don’t see a reason why new languages should use it. That, of course, doesn’t change the fact that we need to deal with the nulls we already have.

🦀

… I realized I’m trans shortly after starting to learn Rust. Are you telling me there’s a casual link?

Compose e ’

Don’t you mean base 10?

Also, clearly seximal is the best

I don’t know many people who count like 👍☝️🖕, so you kinda already do. You’re just allowing more combinations

more sophisticated hawkers, if you will

I actually knew about ZQ :)

but in what case would you ever need :cq ? I’m curious what’s the idea behind that

Edit: I checked, neither work for obsidian verification, including :cq!

disappointing :c