I’m in the US and I’ve not seen any of it either.

Windows 11 kinda sucks, I don’t know why it’s so hard for them to design a consistent UI, but I’ve not seen this ad nonsense.

I am using adguard DNS across my network, so maybe that’s why?

Looks like 86" to play Untitled Goose Game.

The game with the least reason to play widescreen.

Toyota Hilux: the middle-east terrorist’s truck of choice.

But seriously, those things are everywhere in the Middle East and Africa.

Oh awesome, thanks!

Welp, guess I’m going to get rid of Disney+. I already hate that they flooded it with Hulu content. I very much cannot let my kid browse through unattended anymore.

I mean, Poor Things is on there now and it has some of the most explicit sex scenes I’ve seen in a movie in a long time.

I really wish sites with those stupid restricted complexity requirements would just say what they are on the login screen.

“We only allow ‘&#@!()’ because we don’t understand password security, you’re welcome.”

The big brain move is going to reset your password, getting told you can’t use your current password when you type in a “new” one, then going back to the login screen to log in.

That’s not what Apple wants it to be or is advertising it as at all. They don’t expect people to be wearing it all the time when they’re out doing things.

It’s meant to be a supplement to laptops/desktops, then eventually a replacement (I don’t think headsets will ever fully replace traditional computers though).

It’s first and foremost a VR headset with really good AR and video passthrough. They’re not glasses. Apple just doesn’t want you to think that it’s VR because they’ve decided they always have to be “special.”

Mali. The Mali government…

Microsoft THRUSTS it’s throbbing poll into Google Chrome’s wide open download page.

What does Microsoft gain out of pushing Edge so hard. It’s running on Chromium now, they’re not going to break people’s Google habits, they don’t even charge for it.

So why the unwavering push?

Apple hasn’t been banned from anything and they have nothing to do with this. What’s your point?

There should be a copyright system that grants copyright only to those individuals who create the thing, not the corporations that published the thing.

I’m sure there’s someone who will point out why that is a bad idea, but collective ownership seems like it would be a better way to apply takedown notices more appropriately. A takedown order needs to be voted on by the owners of the thing being potentially infringed upon and if the majority does not think that something violates copyright, then the takedown notice will not be sent.

You can be excited about the work the engineers are doing without idolizing the bigoted CEO.

I don’t see why so many people can’t separate the awful business man from the science.

Psh, it’s only worth like 5 bucks now.

Absolute free speech shouldn’t exist. If that were the case, we’d be giving a platform to the worst of the worst. The most vile, hateful speech should not be allowed to exist in a society that claims to want safety, respect for all, and prosperity.

The idea of absolute free speech requires the tolerance of hate, which allows the intolerant to drive out ideas that don’t align with theirs. See here, the Paradox of Tolerance.