The trick is that they’re literally spamming papers at this point.
The trick is that they’re literally spamming papers at this point.
It has been published, but a staggering number of scientific “papers” coming out of China are turning out to be complete fabrications.
Kbin, literally haven’t seen any spam, seen lots about how the fediverse Admins are taking care of it.
So, thank you mods and admins.
Facebook is literally arguing to the US federal government that regulations about social media usage by children, and the data they sell from it, aren’t their problem but are the responsibility of Google and Apple.
Why do you trust them?
Oh of course. But I was following the code standard set by the first one. I suspect everyone else was too.
Because its a non issue to developers.
It was only a hand wringing thing by internet bloggers.
Git checkout -b neverpushtothisbranchthismeansyou
A new protest and shutdown would be to get it into the media eye in a bad light. Not actually do anything of importance to the site.
After all, the 24 hour news cycle lives on scandals.
It’s not the techbros leading this, it’s the BBAs and MBAs that wouldn’t know art if Michelangelo came to life and slapped them in the face with the sistine chapel.
Yes, but it took until an old white British guy codified in the early 1930s for the living tree doctrine to be a thing.
And it was hard-coded in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by Pierre Trudeau. It’s the primary reason why the Canadian fight for marriage equality was so open and shut compared to what the US is still going through.
This is why it is bad that this is happening in the US.
You don’t have the concept of the living tree doctrine in your body of law, or if you do, it’s not particularly well developed. It’s all about the writers intent down there.
laughs in IntelliJ
Gonna be hilarious when hackers figure out how to hijack where this reports back to. Particularly since Google recently got rid of most of their senior devs you know, the ones who can actually make secure code.
You’re merging two different events into one.
I’m talking about the rise of IE. When it was an outright better browser. You’re talking about events that happened when it was at its peak popularity, but was an outright outdated browser, coincidentally just when Chrome was ramping up.
Just like Firefox is now over Chrome.
Except now, with Google doing things MS never even dreamed of, there isn’t whisper of any investigation or sanctions from the EU.
Hell, when they were Netscape they lost to IE. IE became the default that it did because Netscape Navigator would take 5 minutes to boot up, and would load pages slower too.
In the article, it details that the judge ruled this way because the guy had a history of accepting previous contracts with the other guy with short one word answers, so in that context, its valid.
It isn’t the blanket ruling the headline makes you think it is.
1TB can be Recommended Chrome Ram?