Will this post be a target of exactly, you’ll get a few downvotes. Why are you worried about that exactly?

Often when brigading happens, it’s not just the one comment that gets downvoted, you’re whole post history gets downvoted. Heavily downvoted posts don’t show up in feeds, and you end up struggling to interact with the community. Some communities will outright ban (or shadow ban) a heavily downvoted account. Its forced ostracism.

Once again, it’s a question of incentives. People operating individual servers have no interest to allow corporate interference on the platform.

It may not be openly allowed, I understand that. The problem is when you have bad faith actors and shills. They pretend to be not associated with a corporation, but they subtly push an agenda.

I’m not convinced. You’ve made several claims, and maybe it’s obvious to you as to why it’s hard for corporations to infect the fediverse, but not to me. I’m probably too smooth brained to see it.

Here is Phil Jamesson using the behaviour of Reddit and the upvote system to get to the top of /r/videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69bFOYklP-E

What is stopping the marketing team of a corporation to influence the fediverse using similar and more advanced techniques? Lemmy uses an upvote system. Why can’t it be abused like Reddit’s system?

I’ve already seen several examples of small scale brigading. I can’t mention examples because it would immediately make this post another target.

As long as it’s not run by corporations there’s no problem.

Just because the fediverse doesn’t have sponsorships doesn’t mean corporations aren’t interested in poisoning the well. Anyone could be a bad actor. Heck, it could be anyone. I could be a corporate shill and you’d never know.

Wikipedia runs on donations. Does that mean that outside entities aren’t interested in biased editing?

Wait, you guys don’t update your system and install random packages before going on a hacking spree?

What have I been doing all this time?

Chance in a million