Opening your door brought to you by Walmart.

This is not how the real world works

The insanity on sino was funny at times.

I was on reddit since 2011 or so and in the beginning it was awesome and funny and first was a thing and it was like a big clubhouse where everyone was chill for the most part. Then influencers.really picked up steam and the corps started doing their subtle ads and baby Yoda and then the bots came and toxicity and the Donald and the rest of the cesspool exploded.

Lol imagine hiring someone cuz they had used a Microsoft tool…smh

False

Homelab guys probably don’t have the liquid cooling infrastructure needed to pump the fluid.

Vps and CEOs next plz

They’re not selling this picture…lol stop lying.

They’re saying it is not infringement at all so your statement is simply incorrect.

This is the correct ruling based on how ml works.

Lol not at all.

This has already been decided. Inspired works are not covered by copyright.

Let’s be clear. The ai does not in any way “copy” the picture it is trained on.

Who the fuck puts captions ABOVE a picture???

Get the tar…

You just proved my point there is nothing from stopping Google from scanning all those they just have to limit what they show of what they scanned. There it is easy to prove because the content is verbatim.

In the case of ai it is not verbatim. How do you prove the results are directly derived from say reading harry potter vs ingesting a forums worth of content regarding hp? I don’t think as a plaintiff u can show damages or that your works were even used… The only reason this is even an issue is because chatgpt creators admitted they scanned books etc.

It’s not the science it’s the lying.

What is not a different question. As a creator you don’t get to say what or who can ingest your creation. If you did Google image search wouldn’t exist.

The thing you’re failing to realize is that this isn’t the first time a computer has been used to ingest info. The rules you assert have never been true to this point. Crawlers have been scanning web pages and images since the dawn of the Internet.

You act like this just started happening so now you get to put rules on what gets to look at that image. Too late there’s decades of precedent.

Legally there is no difference. Remember, corporations are people.

This article acts like it is a privilege to read a book or hear a song and it can be revoked…lol

Rights are irrelevant.

You made something. That doesn’t give u the right to say what can or can’t ingest it.

Under these rules all fanfic would be illegal.

Search engines would be illegal…can’t scan my website that’s copyrighted. Radio would be illegal. Random ppl listening to ur songs…that’s a nono.

When creating art do you get to make rules about who or what experiences it? Or is that a selfish asshole take?

Paint a picture but only some ppl get to see it. Sing a song but only some get to hear it.

What planet do you live on where those things are true?