[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]
Stuped person says stuped things, people boom
I have trouble with using tone in my words but not interpreting tone from others’ words. Weird, isn’t it?
Formerly on kbin.social and dbzer0
The political campaign is actually the innovation of the film, which was an adaptation.
And then he realized that winning would break the rules, as the salary makes the position considered an asset, so he campaigned for “none of the above”. At the end of the movie, that option wins.
-Oz
Optimize aggressively for size rather than speed.
TIL
No, they don’t. If you’re referring to their ebook selections, they pay for a specific number of licenses to an ebook, then only allow a specific number of patrons to check those ebooks out at any given time. They do this using DRM, to ensure that patrons have their access removed when their checkout period is up. Because refusal to comply would run them afoul of copyright laws and their ebook licensing.
That’s not what it says.
As others have said, making digital copies and distributing is literally piracy and not library stuff.
(unless the Supreme Court really likes you by a 6-4 majority)
The court filings I’ve read corroborate the article.
You should probably read the article. The case is only about how the Archive did more than just library stuff—they made a ton of copies and gave them out for free, then argued that the cost of maintenance somehow made that act legal.
yes, though mbin doesn’t have an all content view, so you’d need to switch to the microblog-only view to see these. kbin has much less development going on but currently has an all content view that combines threads and posts.
they also overhauled the threads view filtering, though the all content and new comments highlighting features are still missing
*bin also has an advantage of integrating microblog as well, though you can’t change URLs in link posts
The article is just a single sentence with the document numbers
For most people, “could” is enough to worry about. Just look at the people flocking whenever their app is bought by an advertising company.
(As for the NYT opinion, I’ll forward this comment: “Waxman worked under Bush as a senior national security advisor. So the administration that believes in torture is advising us that government surveillance is fine and keeps you safe? Not sure I trust the source.” My personal opinion is actually ambivalent towards surveillance, privacy, and safety.)
Interestingly, the software giant added this check since the Windows 11 24H2 will not boot without these instruction sets, according to a previous report. Though speculative, one would wonder if the company has this extra step in case someone uses bypasses to force the OS to boot with an unsupported CPU.
Why is the watermark the headline
I’m saying that they have the ability to ban any freaking thing in their territory. That Huawei is doing well outside of the US is irrelevant. If Huawei’s US division was forced down by the US, that is killing it, and they’re still not American.
That’s not nothing, but still not the be-all and end-all that you seem to want to make it.
Explain further how it isn’t a Chinese company despite its origin and its base of operations. Even if it isn’t, all that’s relevant is that China can influence TikTok into giving them their data for free today.
You won’t just stop the maintenance if TikTok didn’t exist. It’s not like all China cares about is data.
Your question was “why would China get data from TikTok when they can just buy it from Meta”. If China didn’t get the data from ByteDance, ByteDance still incurs the maintenance fee. So no, that is not the expense of getting the data.
“but job loss!1!”
It’s a one-time fee that also earns money back compared to the continuous payments to buy from other sources.
They wanted to, and Qualcomm’s board blocked it. They tried to go forward anyway, and Trump stopped them in 2017.