Reposting this from Qasim Rashid, esq. on Mastodon.

(I do know this is discoverable from Mastodon but heck consider it a boost).

  • twelve@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, it’s nuanced. People smuggling worked like this… They would call her (and/or other NGO) and say “we just dropped x people in the sea at these coordinated, bye!”. She would go and pick them up (she would not make any money out of this).

    What the xenophobic party that was (and kinda is) in power wanted is to her ignore the heads up and let people die in the sea. Because all that party promised to his (debatable) electors is more death in the sea (to scare the other migrants).

    Also all this is polical because the vast majority of illegal immigration is through Balkans anyway

    • ProcurementCat@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They would call her (and/or other NGO) and say “we just dropped x people in the sea at these coordinated, bye!”. She would go and pick them up (she would not make any money out of this).

      The crucial part about that: Captains at sea are required by law to save people or assist vessels that are about to capsize. If she ignored such a call (as the Italian government tells her to), she’d commit a crime. She’d also be liable and could be sued by the survivors or the relatives of the deceased.

      She literally did what the law forces her to do, and what the Italian coast guard should be doing but isn’t.